Stephen Kershnar
Capitol Hill
Riots: Clutching Pearls, Smelling Salts, and Twisted Panties
Dunkirk-Fredonia
Observer
Sunday, January
10, 2021
The crackdown and overreaction to
Wednesday’s Capitol Hill riot is so lacking in proportionality as to constitute
pure pretext for what has and will continue to follow.
In the last few years, there have
been widespread riots, two attempted coups, and an election awash in fraud.
Following these events, a few hundred protesters stormed Capitol Hill, destroyed
property, and fought with the police. The police shot one protester dead, three
people died from medical issues, and one police officer later died from his
injuries.
First, consider the rioting and
looting. Writing in the New York Post, Andy Ngo pointed out that last
May, rioters brought Minneapolis to its knees. He noted that rioters burned
entire neighborhoods to the ground, burned down a police station, and looted
hundreds of businesses. Widespread destruction, looting, and violence also broke
out in Los Angeles, New York City, Seattle, Washington, DC, and dozens of other
cities. During the riots, at least two dozen died.
Leftist elites – for example, Democrats, heads of Silicon Valley and
Wall Street, Hollywood, and university presidents – largely refused to condemn the
violence. Ngo pointed out that Kamala Harris encouraged her followers to donate
to a Minnesota fund that bailed out accused rioters. A dozen Joe Biden campaign
staffers did the same. The fund, Ngo reports, raised $35 million.
In
Portland, Ore., Antifa and Black Lives Matter rioters repeatedly attacked a
building that houses a jail, police station, and sheriff’s office. The rioters tried
to free prisoners. They then started fires that caused workers to flee for their
lives. Radicals forcibly occupied areas in Seattle and Portland. Vandals pulled
down statues.
Did
you see the prissy members of Congress clutching their pearls following these outrages?
Did you miss the sensitive members of the media needing to be revived with
smelling salts? No one
seemed to have gotten too upset when Target stores were looted, parts of cities
occupied, highways disrupted, restaurant patrons harassed, etc. What happened last
Wednesday paled in comparison.
Violent
protests in DC burned a historic church and caused Donald Trump to be
evacuated. A few years ago, protesters forcibly occupied offices, during the
Brett Kavanaugh hearings, and the Wisconsin legislative building. Did the members
of Congress collapse on their fainting couches? Did the media need emergency
meetings with their therapists?
Second, consider that the left staged two coups. The Inspector General’s report makes it
clear that the Obama administration knew that the Russian investigation was fraudulent
almost from the start. The Inspector General’s report and later news stories
tell us that the case rested heavily on stories from a single source (the
source for the Steele dossier). Under oath, the source said that he made up the
stories. The source was even investigated to see if he was a Russian spy.
The FISA court - a
court that the FBI and DOJ used to get secret search warrants - took a very dim
view of the Obama administration’s abuse in getting warrants. We know there was
criminal activity - the Inspector General Report even referred to officials for
prosecution – and yet, unbelievably, only one person has as of yet been
prosecuted. It is increasingly clear that Barack Obama was part of this. The
same Congressional and media virgins who are so outraged at Wednesday’s riots, could
not care less about this far more dangerous development.
The impeachment of
Donald Trump was only slightly less ridiculous than the Russia Hoax. Hunter
Biden was engaged in illegal influence-peddling in the Ukraine, thereby profiting
from Joe Biden’s influence. Joe Biden had a prosecutor looking into the Hunter
Biden situation fired. Trump suggested that Ukraine investigate this activity. On
a side note, the New York Post story and statements by Hunter’s business
partner provide us with yet more evidence that Joe and Hunter were caught with
their pants down. The law permitted Trump’s actions and, arguably, required
them.
Third, consider that the recent
election was awash in fraud. Texas' attorney
general’s motion to the Supreme Court documented the various illegal changes in
voting procedures in the battleground states. This included illegally changing the
way in which mail-in ballots were distributed, mail-in-date requirements
handled, signatures verified, and so on. Seventeen other states
signed onto the complaint. Many election workers signed affidavits alleging vote-counting
irregularities and other illegal activity, especially in the cities that were
at the heart of battleground-state controversy. The vote counting stunk to high
hell as vote counting was paused, poll workers were kicked out or told to
leave, and suspicious activity caught on tape. Trump lost the presidential
election despite the fact that the Republicans won almost all of the presidential
bellwether counties and toss-up House elections and the fact that Trump got nearly
10 million more votes than last time. Clearly, there was widespread election
fraud. The issue is whether there was enough to reverse the election. Likely,
there was.
In response to Wednesday’s Capitol
Hill riots, Twitter permanently banned Michael Flynn, Sidney Powell, and Donald
Trump. Simon and Schuster canceled Senator Josh Hawley’s book in retaliation
for his challenging the election. Amazon, Apple, and Google shut down Twitter’s
competitor, Parler, because it does not censor those whom the left wants
censored. The Conservative Treehouse, Laura Loomer, and the WalkAway site are
being or have been deplatformed in various ways. Pressure is being brought on
cable companies to shut down Fox News and, especially, Tucker Carlson. Earlier Big
Tech – for example, Google, Facebook, and Twitter – censored the New York
Post and sharply reduced traffic to Breitbart, while the mainstream media
refused to show Any Ngo’s videos of Antifa and BLM violence.
In general, people
should not trespass, hit people, break other people’s things, or violate the
law. Still, we think that civil disobedience is sometimes permissible.
Consider, for example, sit-ins at lunch counters in the segregated South,
Edward Snowden’s release of information that showed a massive illegal search,
and the illegal release of classified documents that showed that we were losing
a war (Pentagon Papers).
Is protesting an
election awash in fraud following two attempted coups and a summer of rioting a
good reason for civil disobedience? I do not know because I do not have a good
enough theory of civil disobedience. In any case, the Capitol Hill riot does
not justify the crackdown or pearl-clutching.
1 comment:
Agreed. Mary Rees, who had written a rebuttal piece to your article, is obviously misinformed by legacy media. I look for your columns and find them to be full of sound reasoning.
Post a Comment